While
the new permanent members would in principle have veto powers that the current
five have, Akbaruddin said, "they shall not exercise the veto until a
decision on the matter has been taken during a review".
India
and other members of the G4 have offered to initially forgo veto powers as
permanent members in a reformed Security Council as a bargaining chip to get
the reform process moving.
"The
issue of veto is important, but we should not allow it to have a veto over the
process of Council reform itself," said India's Permanent Representative
Syed Akbaruddin, who was speaking on Tuesday on behalf of the G4 at the
Inter-Governmental Negotiations (IGN) on Council reforms.
While
the new permanent members would in principle have veto powers that the current
five have, Akbaruddin said, "they shall not exercise the veto until a
decision on the matter has been taken during a review".
TEN
THINGS TO KNOW ABOUT WHAT HAPPENED AT THE UN:
1.
India, Brazil, Germany and Japan
constitute the G4, which lobbies for Council reforms and they mutually support
each other's candidatures for permanent seats on an expanded body.
2.
The G4 group rejected suggestions to
create a category of longer-term elected members of the Council as a ploy to
block adding new permanent members.
3.
Expanding only the non-permanent
categories would only worsen "the imbalance of influence" in the
Council and "tilt the scales" in favour of an outdated set-up, he
said.
4.
Akbaruddin was responding to Italy's
Permanent Representative Sebastiano Cardi, who opposed expanding the permanent
membership and instead suggested creating a new category of elected membership
with longer terms than the current two years.
5.
Cardi made the proposal on behalf of
Uniting for Consensus (UfC), a 13-member group that includes Pakistan. The
group has been waging a decades-long battle against expanding permanent
membership and blocking the reform process.
6.
Approaching reforms from a narrow
national perspective of ensuring that certain countries do not get permanent
membership - for example, Pakistan's opposition to India - through the reform
process, the UfC suggested adding 11 seats to the Council, with nine of them
having longer terms.
7.
Deriding the UfC proposal as "old
hat", Akbaruddin said that the 1944 Dumbarton Oaks conference held in
Washington to negotiate the shape of the UN had rejected suggestions for the
longer-term Council membership.
8.
Any proposal for Council reforms without
an expansion of the number of the permanent seats does "grave injustice to
Africa's aspirations for equality," he said.
9.
The G4 also pointed out that the number
and allocation of non-permanent seats have outlived their relevance since the
UN was formed and the reform in 1965 when the number of non-permanent members
was increased from six to 10.
10.
Akbaruddin said that 53 members of the
Asia-Pacific group of nations have only two elected seats on the council, while
the 26-member Western Europe group also get two.
(Inputs
from IANS)
No comments:
Post a Comment