Scientists
have discovered seven Earth-sized planets, so tightly packed around a dim star
that a year there lasts less than two weeks. The number of planets and the
radiation levels they receive from their star, TRAPPIST-1, make these worlds a
miniature analogue of our own Solar System.
The
excitement surrounding TRAPPIST-1 was so great that the discovery was announced
with an article in Nature accompanied by a NASA news conference. In the
last two decades, nearly 3,500
planets have been found orbiting stars beyond our Sun, but most don’t
make headlines.
How
likely are we really to find a blue marble like our Earth among these new
worlds?
Earth
2.0?
We
still know little about these planets with certainty, but initial clues look
enticing.
All
seven worlds complete an orbit in between 1.5 and 13 days. So closely are they
huddled that a person standing on one planet might see the neighbouring worlds
in the sky even larger than our moon. The short years place the planets closer
to their star than any planet sits to the Sun. Happily, they avoid being baked
by TRAPPIST-1 because it is incredibly dim.
TRAPPIST-1 is a small ultracool
dwarf star with a luminosity roughly 1/1000th that of the Sun.
Comparing the two at Wednesday’s news conference, lead author of the Nature paper,
Michaël Gillon, said that if the Sun were scaled to the size of a basketball,
TRAPPIST-1 would be a puny golf ball. The resulting paltry amount of heat means
that three of the seven TRAPPIST-1 planets actually receive similar amounts of
radiation as Venus, Earth and Mars.
Here’s
the good news first.
The
seven siblings are all Earth-sized, with radii between three quarters and one
times that of our home planet and masses that range from roughly 50% to 150% of
Earth’s (the mass of the outermost world remains uncertain).
Because
all are smaller than 1.6 times Earth’s radius, the seven
TRAPPIST-1 planets are likely to be rocky worlds, not gaseous Neptunes.
TRAPPIST-1d, e and f are within the star’s temperate region – aka the
“Goldilocks zone” where it’s not too hot and not too cold – where an Earth-like
planet could support liquid water on its surface.
The
orbits of the six inner planets are nearly resonant, meaning that in the time
it takes for the innermost planet to orbit the star eight times, its outer
siblings make five, three and two orbits.
Such
resonant chains are expected around stars where the planets have moved from
where they originally formed. This migration occurs when the planets are still
young and embedded in the star’s gaseous planet-forming disc. As the gravity of
the young planet and the gas disc pull on one another, the planet’s orbit can
change, usually moving towards the star.
If
multiple planets are in the system, their gravity also pulls on one another.
This nudges the planets into resonant orbits as they migrate through the gas
disc. The result is a string of resonant planets close to the star, just like
that seen encircling TRAPPIST-1.
Being
born far from the star offers a couple of potential advantages. Dim stars like
TRAPPIST-1 are irritable when young, emitting flares and high radiation that
may sterilise the surface of nearby planets. If the TRAPPIST-1 system did
indeed form further away and migrate inwards, its worlds may have avoided
getting fried.
Originating
where temperatures are colder would also mean the planets formed with a large
fraction of ice. As the planets migrate inwards, this ice could melt into an
ocean. This notion is supported by the estimated densities of the planets,
which are low enough to suggest volatile-rich compositions, like water or a
thick atmosphere.
Not
an Earth?
Since
our search for extraterrestrial life focuses on the presence of water, melted icy worlds seem ideal.
But
this may actually bode ill for habitability. While 71% of the Earth’s surface
is covered by seas, water makes up less than 0.1% of our planet’s mass. A
planet with a high fraction of water may become a water
world: all ocean and no exposed land.
Deep
water could also mean there’s a thick layer of ice on the ocean floor. With the
planet’s rocky core separated from both air and sea, no carbon-silicate cycle could form – a
process that acts as a thermostat to adjust the level of warming carbon dioxide
in the air on Earth.
If
the TRAPPIST-1 planets can’t compensate for different levels of radiation from
their star, the temperate zone for the planet shrinks to a thin strip. Any
little variation, from small ellipicities in the planet’s orbit to variations
in the stellar brightness, could turn the world into a snowball or baked
desert.
Even
if the oceans were sufficiently shallow to avoid this fate, an icy composition
might produce a very strange atmosphere. On the early Earth, air was spewed out
in volcanic plumes. If a TRAPPIST-1 planet’s interior is more akin to a giant
comet than to a silicate-rich Earth, the air expelled risks being rich in the
greenhouse gases of ammonia and methane. Both trap heat at the planet’s
surface, meaning the best location for liquid water might actually be in a
region cooler than the “Goldilocks zone”.
Finally,
the TRAPPIST-1 system’s orbits are problematic. Situated so close to the star,
the planets are likely in tidal lock – with one face permanently turned towards
the star – resulting in perpetual day on one side and everlasting night on the
other.
Not
only would this be weird to experience, the associated extremes of temperatures
could also evaporate all water and collapse the atmosphere if the
planet’s winds are unable to redistribute heat.
Also,
even a small ellipticity in the planets’ seemingly circular orbits could power
a second kind of warmth, called tidal heating, making the planets into
Venus-like hothouses. Slight elongations in the planet’s path around its star
would cause the pull from the star’s gravity to strengthen and weaken during
its year, flexing the planet like a stress ball and generating tidal heat.
This
process occurs on three of Jupiter’s largest moons whose mildly elliptical
paths are caused by resonant orbits similar to the TRAPPIST-1 worlds. In Europa
and Ganymede, the flexing heat allows subsurface liquid oceans to exist. But
Jupiter’s innermost moon, Io, is the most volcanic place in our Solar System.
If
the TRAPPIST-1 planets’ orbits are similarly bent, they could turn out to be
sweltering.
The
view from here
So
how will we ever know what the TRAPPIST-1 planets are really like? To investigate
the possible scenarios, we need to take a look at the atmosphere of the
TRAPPIST-1 siblings.
TRAPPIST-1
was named for the Belgian 60cm TRAnsiting Planets and Planetesimal Small
Telescope in Chile that detected the star’s first three planets last year (it also
happens to be the name of a type of Belgian beer). As the name suggests, both
the original three worlds and four new planetary siblings were discovered using
the transit technique; the tiny dip in starlight as
the planets passed between the star and the Earth.
Transiting
makes the planets excellent candidates for the next
generation of telescopes with their ability to identify molecules in
the planet’s air as starlight passes through the gas. The next five years may
therefore give us the first real look at a rocky planet with a very different
history to anything in our Solar System.
Thomas
Zurbuchen, associate administer of the Science Mission Directorate at NASA,
declared the discovery of TRAPPIST-1 as, “A leap forward to answering ‘are we
alone?’”.
But
the real treasure of TRAPPIST-1 is not the possibility that the planets may be
just like the one we call home; it’s the exciting thought that we might be
looking at something entirely new.
Scientists
have discovered seven Earth-sized planets, so tightly packed around a dim star
that a year there lasts less than two weeks. The number of planets and the
radiation levels they receive from their star, TRAPPIST-1, make these worlds a
miniature analogue of our own Solar System.
The
excitement surrounding TRAPPIST-1 was so great that the discovery was announced
with an article in Nature accompanied by a NASA news conference. In the
last two decades, nearly 3,500
planets have been found orbiting stars beyond our Sun, but most don’t
make headlines.
How
likely are we really to find a blue marble like our Earth among these new
worlds?
Earth
2.0?
We
still know little about these planets with certainty, but initial clues look
enticing.
All
seven worlds complete an orbit in between 1.5 and 13 days. So closely are they
huddled that a person standing on one planet might see the neighbouring worlds
in the sky even larger than our moon. The short years place the planets closer
to their star than any planet sits to the Sun. Happily, they avoid being baked
by TRAPPIST-1 because it is incredibly dim.
TRAPPIST-1 is a small ultracool
dwarf star with a luminosity roughly 1/1000th that of the Sun.
Comparing the two at Wednesday’s news conference, lead author of the Nature paper,
Michaël Gillon, said that if the Sun were scaled to the size of a basketball,
TRAPPIST-1 would be a puny golf ball. The resulting paltry amount of heat means
that three of the seven TRAPPIST-1 planets actually receive similar amounts of
radiation as Venus, Earth and Mars.
Here’s
the good news first.
The
seven siblings are all Earth-sized, with radii between three quarters and one
times that of our home planet and masses that range from roughly 50% to 150% of
Earth’s (the mass of the outermost world remains uncertain).
Because
all are smaller than 1.6 times Earth’s radius, the seven
TRAPPIST-1 planets are likely to be rocky worlds, not gaseous Neptunes.
TRAPPIST-1d, e and f are within the star’s temperate region – aka the
“Goldilocks zone” where it’s not too hot and not too cold – where an Earth-like
planet could support liquid water on its surface.
The
orbits of the six inner planets are nearly resonant, meaning that in the time
it takes for the innermost planet to orbit the star eight times, its outer
siblings make five, three and two orbits.
Such
resonant chains are expected around stars where the planets have moved from
where they originally formed. This migration occurs when the planets are still
young and embedded in the star’s gaseous planet-forming disc. As the gravity of
the young planet and the gas disc pull on one another, the planet’s orbit can
change, usually moving towards the star.
If
multiple planets are in the system, their gravity also pulls on one another.
This nudges the planets into resonant orbits as they migrate through the gas
disc. The result is a string of resonant planets close to the star, just like
that seen encircling TRAPPIST-1.
Being
born far from the star offers a couple of potential advantages. Dim stars like
TRAPPIST-1 are irritable when young, emitting flares and high radiation that
may sterilise the surface of nearby planets. If the TRAPPIST-1 system did
indeed form further away and migrate inwards, its worlds may have avoided
getting fried.
Originating
where temperatures are colder would also mean the planets formed with a large
fraction of ice. As the planets migrate inwards, this ice could melt into an
ocean. This notion is supported by the estimated densities of the planets,
which are low enough to suggest volatile-rich compositions, like water or a
thick atmosphere.
Not
an Earth?
Since
our search for extraterrestrial life focuses on the presence of water, melted icy worlds seem ideal.
But
this may actually bode ill for habitability. While 71% of the Earth’s surface
is covered by seas, water makes up less than 0.1% of our planet’s mass. A
planet with a high fraction of water may become a water
world: all ocean and no exposed land.
Deep
water could also mean there’s a thick layer of ice on the ocean floor. With the
planet’s rocky core separated from both air and sea, no carbon-silicate cycle could form – a
process that acts as a thermostat to adjust the level of warming carbon dioxide
in the air on Earth.
If
the TRAPPIST-1 planets can’t compensate for different levels of radiation from
their star, the temperate zone for the planet shrinks to a thin strip. Any
little variation, from small ellipicities in the planet’s orbit to variations
in the stellar brightness, could turn the world into a snowball or baked
desert.
Even
if the oceans were sufficiently shallow to avoid this fate, an icy composition
might produce a very strange atmosphere. On the early Earth, air was spewed out
in volcanic plumes. If a TRAPPIST-1 planet’s interior is more akin to a giant
comet than to a silicate-rich Earth, the air expelled risks being rich in the
greenhouse gases of ammonia and methane. Both trap heat at the planet’s
surface, meaning the best location for liquid water might actually be in a
region cooler than the “Goldilocks zone”.
Finally,
the TRAPPIST-1 system’s orbits are problematic. Situated so close to the star,
the planets are likely in tidal lock – with one face permanently turned towards
the star – resulting in perpetual day on one side and everlasting night on the
other.
Not
only would this be weird to experience, the associated extremes of temperatures
could also evaporate all water and collapse the atmosphere if the
planet’s winds are unable to redistribute heat.
Also,
even a small ellipticity in the planets’ seemingly circular orbits could power
a second kind of warmth, called tidal heating, making the planets into
Venus-like hothouses. Slight elongations in the planet’s path around its star
would cause the pull from the star’s gravity to strengthen and weaken during
its year, flexing the planet like a stress ball and generating tidal heat.
This
process occurs on three of Jupiter’s largest moons whose mildly elliptical
paths are caused by resonant orbits similar to the TRAPPIST-1 worlds. In Europa
and Ganymede, the flexing heat allows subsurface liquid oceans to exist. But
Jupiter’s innermost moon, Io, is the most volcanic place in our Solar System.
If
the TRAPPIST-1 planets’ orbits are similarly bent, they could turn out to be
sweltering.
The
view from here
So
how will we ever know what the TRAPPIST-1 planets are really like? To investigate
the possible scenarios, we need to take a look at the atmosphere of the
TRAPPIST-1 siblings.
TRAPPIST-1
was named for the Belgian 60cm TRAnsiting Planets and Planetesimal Small
Telescope in Chile that detected the star’s first three planets last year (it also
happens to be the name of a type of Belgian beer). As the name suggests, both
the original three worlds and four new planetary siblings were discovered using
the transit technique; the tiny dip in starlight as
the planets passed between the star and the Earth.
Transiting
makes the planets excellent candidates for the next
generation of telescopes with their ability to identify molecules in
the planet’s air as starlight passes through the gas. The next five years may
therefore give us the first real look at a rocky planet with a very different
history to anything in our Solar System.
Thomas
Zurbuchen, associate administer of the Science Mission Directorate at NASA,
declared the discovery of TRAPPIST-1 as, “A leap forward to answering ‘are we
alone?’”.
But
the real treasure of TRAPPIST-1 is not the possibility that the planets may be
just like the one we call home; it’s the exciting thought that we might be
looking at something entirely new.
No comments:
Post a Comment